Man and woman charged with terrorism offences after being arrested on Alum Rock Road

A man and a woman arrested on Alum Rock Road last week on suspicion of terrorism offences have been charged.

Ummariyat Mirza, aged 21, from Washwood Heath, and Zainub Mirza, aged 23 from Bordesley Green, were arrested by officers from West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit (WMCTU) on Wednesday 29th March on suspicion of preparing for terrorist acts and were detained under terrorism legislation.

They have both been charged as outlined below and will appear before Westminster Magistrates Court later today (06/04).

Ummariyat Mirza

1.    On or before the 29 day of March 2017, with the intention of committing acts of terrorism engaged in conduct in preparation for giving effect to his intention, namely by conducting research and purchasing a knife and other items which would assist him carry out an attack in the UK. Contrary to section 5(1) of the Terrorism Act 2006.

2.    On 2 February 2017, within the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, possessed a document containing information of a kind likely to be of use to a person preparing or committing an act of terrorism, namely the ‘Anarchist Cookbook 2000’. Contrary to s.58(1)(b) Terrorism Act 2000.

3.    On 28 February 2017, within the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, possessed a document containing information of a kind likely to be of use to a person preparing or committing an act of terrorism, namely the ‘Mujahideen Poisons handbook’. Contrary to s.58(1)(b) Terrorism Act 2000.

Zainub Mirza

1.    On 10 January 2017, within the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, provided a service to others, namely sent a link to a beheading video, that enabled others to listen to or look at a terrorist publication, namely a video of a beheading, intending an effect of her conduct to be a direct or indirect encouragement to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, or being reckless as to whether her conduct has such an effect. Contrary to section 2(1) and (2)(d) of the Terrorism Act 2006.

2.    On 11 January 2017, within the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, provided a service to others, namely sent a link to an ISIS propaganda video showing a number of beheadings and executions, that enabled others to listen to or look at a terrorist publication, namely a video of a beheading, intending an effect of her conduct to be a direct or indirect encouragement to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, or being reckless as to whether her conduct has such an effect. Contrary to section 2(1) and (2)(d) of the Terrorism Act 2006.

3.    On 13 January 2017, within the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, provided a service to others, namely sent a link to an execution video, that enabled others to listen to or look at a terrorist publication, namely a video of an execution, intending an effect of her conduct to be a direct or indirect encouragement to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, or being reckless as to whether her conduct has such an effect. Contrary to section 2(1) and (2)(d) of the Terrorism Act 2006.

4.    On 14 January 2017, within the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, distributed a terrorist publication, namely an image of a male holding two severed heads, intending an effect of her conduct to be a direct or indirect encouragement to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, or being reckless as to whether her conduct has such an effect. Contrary to section 2(1) and (2)(a) of the Terrorism Act 2006.

5.    On 23 January 2017, within the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court, provided a service to others, namely sent a link to a beheading video, that enabled others to listen to or look at a terrorist publication, namely a video of a beheading, intending an effect of her conduct to be a direct or indirect encouragement to the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, or being reckless as to whether her conduct has such an effect. Contrary to section 2(1) and (2)(d) of the Terrorism Act 2006.

 

Police searched six properties in Birmingham – five homes and one business address – as part of the investigation; these searches have completed.

The arrests were pre-planned and intelligence-led and there was no risk to the public’s safety.

These charges are not linked to the Westminster attack.

Related Posts

Recent Posts

Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors to relocate to new offices in the city centre.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors has announced today (26/04) that it will be relocating hundreds of staff to new...

Teenage car-jacking suspects arrested during morning raids across Birmingham.

Three more teenagers suspected of being involved in car-jackings across Birmingham have been arrested during morning raids as West Midlands...

Petition to keep Moseley Road Swimming Baths open

Moseley Road Baths is a much loved Grade II* Edwardian swimming pool in Balsall Heath. There is one pool which...

CEO of NEC group apologises for ticketing issue at Bruno Mars concert.

NEC Group CEO Paul Thandi has this afternoon (25/04) apologised after a number of people were affected by ticketing issues...

Anthony Joshua vs Wladimir Klitschko fight will be showing on the biggest screen in Birmingham.

Shooters, which opened on Broad Street late last year, will be showing the Anthony Joshua vs Wladimir Klitschko fight on their enormous...